<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia Rules Against Hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2010/02/21/austrailia-rules-against-hollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2010/02/21/austrailia-rules-against-hollywood/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Goodsell</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2010/02/21/austrailia-rules-against-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-4110</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Goodsell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentagentblog.com/?p=1012#comment-4110</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting. So, will this case be followed closely in the US? The studios&#039; seem to be sparing no expense in launching an appeal here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s interesting. So, will this case be followed closely in the US? The studios&#039; seem to be sparing no expense in launching an appeal here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firemark</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2010/02/21/austrailia-rules-against-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-3916</link>
		<dc:creator>Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentagentblog.com/?p=1012#comment-3916</guid>
		<description>It should be noted that in the US, we&#039;d likely see the same result, since under the DMCA safe-harbor, an ISP is protected from liability (provided it complies with notice &amp;  takedown procedures, etc.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be noted that in the US, we&#039;d likely see the same result, since under the DMCA safe-harbor, an ISP is protected from liability (provided it complies with notice &amp;  takedown procedures, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

